A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal internet site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes captivated countrywide notice adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier and the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, find to construct their relatives dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven residents. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining built by their potential neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted under scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each citizens of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their arranging permission by creating a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, resulting in an encroachment over a Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to strict controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partly created, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their view, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary attempts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In accordance with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions, an image that has considering that come to be emblematic on the intensity on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Acquire visual evidence in the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water for the duration of serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become One of the more placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these types of steps had been cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being lined intimately via the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute while in the legal timeline.
Within the core from the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as made, goes over and above what was authorized and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has actually been described as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and problems hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by worry for environmental security and adherence to scheduling law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their very long-standing connection to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically wanting to build a family dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Particular Area of Conservation and say that every one will work are already carried out based upon Skilled advice and accredited options. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes entering the sea through a storm, do not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your problem a large number of observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming additional contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in local advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waistline-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Bodily actuality with the coastline and the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an excessive strategy.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result continues to be uncertain. The court need to identify whether the wall as built complies with organizing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Particular Place of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling conditions. Still the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who need to live along with one another prolonged once the lawful expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the case prolong outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles for example environmental safety and residence rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of organic beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre on the dispute stands partly created, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to eventually be altered, removed, or done as planned will count on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.